Canadian resources should mean Canadian access

Canadian Compute: what should stay in Canada?

If Canada supplies the land, power, gas, water access, grid connection capacity, permits, and public tolerance for gigawatt-scale AI campuses, Canada should get guaranteed access to serious compute — not just construction jobs and a thank-you card.

Why I care about Canadian access

If someone wants to generate fake pictures, spam content, junk videos, or another chatbot answer about nothing, that can run anywhere. That is not the national-interest argument for using Canadian land, power, gas, water access, grid connection capacity, permits, and public patience.

Canadian researchers, universities, hospitals, startups and public agencies will need serious AI compute. The useful question is whether they will be able to get it when they need it.

If Canada supplies the resources, Canada should receive measurable compute benefit.

The idea

Every foreign-controlled gigawatt-scale AI campus should be required to sign a Canadian Compute Contract before the project application is treated as complete. This is a public-interest framework, not a final statute, but it is the right starting point.

A starting target

A starting target around 5% of the project’s usable AI compute value, delivered as practical compute access, credits, funding for equivalent Canadian sovereign compute, or another auditable structure. It should not require direct access to a hyperscaler’s internal systems.

Canadian public-interest users

Priority access for Canadian universities, hospitals, medical research, science, agriculture, energy, climate, public agencies, Indigenous research priorities, startups, and small businesses.

Don’t water it down

This dividend does not replace property tax, local jobs, procurement, grid-cost payments, water mitigation, cleanup security, or normal regulatory obligations.

Put it in a contract

Before a foreign-controlled AI campus receives land-use support, grid connection arrangements, power contracts, water licensing, public incentives, or expedited approvals, the proponent should sign a simple public pledge.

This is not about stopping serious projects. It is about making sure Canada gets more than construction jobs and a thank-you card.

Minimum terms

TermWhat it should require
Minimum allocationA starting target around 5% of usable AI compute value, delivered through usable access, a value-equivalent compute-credit pool, or funding for equivalent Canadian sovereign compute reserved for public-interest and innovation users.
Foreign-controlled projectsApplies to foreign-owned or foreign-controlled hyperscale AI campuses, especially projects at or above 1 GW or projects seeking major public infrastructure support.
Equivalent capacity optionIf direct access to the operator’s internal platform is impractical, the proponent must fund equivalent Canadian sovereign compute through an approved Canadian provider or public compute trust.
Canadian Compute TrustThe allocation should be administered independently, with transparent eligibility rules and representation from research, medicine, public-sector, startup, Indigenous, and provincial/federal interests.
Useful compute onlyCredits must be usable for serious workloads, not leftover scraps, obsolete hardware, artificial waitlists, marketing trials, or capacity that cannot realistically be scheduled.
No data grabCanadian users keep control of their data, intellectual property, research outputs, and confidential information unless they explicitly agree otherwise.
Annual auditPublish total available capacity, Canadian allocation, used credits, unused credits, waitlists, sector distribution, and delivery shortfalls.
Use-it-or-fund-itIf the project cannot deliver the promised allocation directly, it must fund an equivalent pool of Canadian compute capacity elsewhere.
Approval conditionThe pledge should be filed before the application is accepted as complete, then converted into enforceable conditions in development agreements, power arrangements, benefit agreements, or licence approvals where possible.

What I would count

  • Compute credits Canadian researchers can actually use.
  • Medical, scientific, agricultural, energy, climate, public-safety, and public-health workloads.
  • Startup and SME access that helps Canadian companies build products in Canada.
  • Canadian-controlled data residency and clear privacy terms.
  • Audited public reporting showing the allocation was delivered.

What I would not count

  • Marketing credits that expire before anyone can use them.
  • Low-value consumer AI access dressed up as public benefit.
  • Compute that is technically “available” but practically impossible to schedule.
  • Foreign-controlled access terms that take Canadian data or IP as the price of admission.
  • Counting construction jobs as a substitute for strategic compute access.

Ask before approval

Once the power contracts are signed, the land is rezoned, the water licence is issued, and the campus is under construction, governments lose leverage. The compute dividend belongs at the front of the process.

Foreign-owned hyperscale AI campuses can still be welcome in Canada. But welcome does not mean free. If the project needs Canadian resources, the Canadian benefit needs to be written down before the ribbon cutting.

Sources and notes